Saturday, November 2, 2013

HISTORIC FAILURES OF OBAMA AS PRESIDENT



1)      Just like George W. Bush, Obama failed to capitalize on the opportunities presented by the ending of the Cold War.
2)      He failed to end the war in Afghanistan in a timely manner. He accepted the time line established by George W. Bush to end the military involvement in Iraq.
3)      He lost the Moral High Ground to Vladimir Putin in the case of Edward Snowden.
4)      He failed to end the Bush Tax Cuts in December 2010 costing the economy 4 trillion dollars in lost revenue. (Source: David Stockman, Budget Director under Ronald Reagan)
5)      He failed to set his priorities right. Instead of seeking a Tax Reform to enhance revenues when he first get elected, he opted for ACA to spend more.
6)      In every opportunity, he betrayed and violated all political principles of Progressives Agenda.
7)      He failed to prosecute corrupt Wall Street Bankers.
8)      Instead of offering a vision for the country and leading, he simply opted to be a hands-on manager.
9)      He instigated and supported the social unrest in Syria.
10)   He hurt the image of the Office of the President of the United States of America by projecting weakness and indecisiveness.
11)   He failed to take any steps to decelerate the war on terror by failing to understand the root causes of terrorism.
12)   He opposed to investigations looking into Saudi involvement in 9/11.
13)   He failed to take concrete steps to improve economy and create jobs.
14)   He became a suspect of war crimes and crimes against the humanity by ordering drone strikes.
15)   He failed to close the Guantanamo.
16)   He promised but failed to balance the budget at the end of his first term.
17)   He failed to push Universal Health Care instead of ACA.
18)   He failed to differentiate his Presidency from that of George W. Bush by continuing to implement his predecessor’s foreign policies he criticized so much during his campaign.
19)   He failed to change the course of decline the country is currently in.
20)   In every opportunity, he opted to elevate his political interests and image instead of dealing with our nation’s challenges.
21)   When he was first elected, he failed to form a White House team of intellectuals. Instead he surrounded himself with Wall Street Bankers.
22)   To this day, he does not understand the economic problems we are facing. Instead he acts like a song and dance man tap dancing around the issues.

Rightly or wrongly, this is how I see it. Of course, I could be wrong.

Monday, May 13, 2013

THE BIG PICTURE




Part 1... Are we failing to see the big picture on the US economy? After the WWII, most of Europe, Russia and Japan laid in ruins. Their factories were leveled, their industrial capacity decimated. The United States, on the other hand, came out of the war with their full industrial base intact, ready to supply all other nations with manufactured goods. As a result, the US economy prospered, especially in 50s and 60s. Today, however, the situation is different. Europe, Russia and Japan once again are power houses of industrial capacity and manufactured goods. Add to that a powerful China with a high capacity industrial complex and an ever expanding massive global trade reach. As a result, today, we import more than we export which means huge trade deficits and continuously shrinking industrial base and manufacturing jobs. To make matters worse, our consecutive Administrations are more interested in pleasing special interests, satisfying greed and running astronomical budget deficits while our two party system systematically engages in ever worsening political back biting and gridlock.

It is easy to see that our economic challenges are structural and they seem to be feeding on themselves to get worse by the minute. So what, if any, can be done to come out of this historic quagmire? Solutions can be found but implementing those solutions seem to be out of the question considering today’s poisonous political atmosphere. Nevertheless, failure is not an option unless we choose to drift into oblivion and take our inevitable place on history’s dusty pages to become a “has been” empire like once majestic Rome.

History is full of examples of great empires, long disappeared taking with them their once exceptional cultures. Only thing that is common among them is not how they had become great empires but rather how they all have disappeared from the scene with the passing of time proving once again that nothing is permanent except change, leaving us with the inescapable conclusion that greed, corruption, grid lock and never ending military adventurism do inevitably lead to destruction from within.

Despite prevailing pessimism that we as a nation have reached a point of no return, we must stand up and fight back with vigor and determination to change the course of history we are currently on and once again try to be the nation everyone admires.  

Be on the look out in the near future for Part 2...


Tuesday, April 9, 2013

2nd Amendment


2nd Amendment was enacted on December 15, 1791… It simply says;

“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Does the 2nd Amendment guarantee individuals the right to bear arms? Thousands of volumes of opinions and interpretations have been written on the subject so is there a need for one more opinion?

If you think there is, keep on reading…

As far as I can gather, in 1791, we lived in a very different country. Most of the population used to live in farms, engaged in husbandry. When the need arose, people were called upon to bear arms and join together to form a “militia”. This was the case when The Continental Army was established by a resolution of the Continental Congress on June 14, 1775. The Continental Army also included a number of militia units from the States. Most of the weaponry of the Continental army was muskets, canons and pistols and cavalry also had sabers. (The Continental Army was disbanded in 1783 after the Treaty of Paris ended the revolutionary war. The 1st and 2nd Regiments went on to form the nucleus of the Legion of the United States in 1792 under General Anthony Wayne. This became the foundation of the United States Army in 1796, 5 years after the adoption of the 2nd Amendment).

According to historians and Constitutional scholars, early English settlers in America viewed the right to bear arms and form state militias as important part of their rights for the purpose of enabling the people to organize a well-regulated militia system, participating in law enforcement by forming a posse, deterring a future tyrannical government in form of a monarchy, repelling a possible invasion force, suppressing insurrection (allegedly including slave revolts) and facilitating a natural right of collective self-defense.

During that period, public use of the English language was also somewhat different. Years later, Lincoln would start his Gettysburg address on November 19, 1863 by saying “Four score and seven years ago…” instead of just saying “87 years ago”. Today, the term of “A Well Regulated Militia” roughly refers to the equivalent of present day National Guard. Yet, there were no regular Army units at that time which would resemble anything like today’s Army, Navy or Air Force. Even during the Civil War, most of the combatants on both sides were regular folks who answered the call of duty and after the end of the war, those who survived simply laid their arms and went home.

When considered against this context, 2nd Amendment is simply saying that people have the right to bear arms to form a well-regulated militia (army) since a well-regulated militia is essential for the security of a free state. As far as I can see, there is nothing in the 2nd Amendment to secure the right of individuals to own assault weapons, high capacity magazines, armor piercing bullets, RPG-7s, IEDs, fissile material, ICBMs and nuclear warheads for personal use or defense.

Situation on Korean Peninsula, April 2013



Let us look into the situation on Korean Peninsula;
1) We have 30K troops in South Korea, North has 1 million plus 6 million reserves.
2) Most of our military is tied up in Afghanistan till the end of 2014.
3) Our troops are showing combat fatigue since many are on their 3rd or 4th deployment.
4) We can't use nuclear or chemical weapons against the North because of China and Russia and yet if         they have them, North Korea has every reason to use them to  spread the conflict worldwide and win.
5) Air superiority alone can’t win wars. Carpet bombing could not win Vietnam War.
6) Where will the money come from for this war? Borrow more from Chinese while fighting Chinese or print more?
7) Kim Jung Un figured out that China simply can’t afford to let North Korea be taken off the map regardless of the rhetoric.
8) Strategic equation between North Korea, China, Russia and the US has not changed since the end of Korean War in 1953. Soviet Mig-15s flew combat missions against us during Korean War. Chinese soldiers made the back bone of the Communist forces, a scenario likely to repeat.
9) Kim Jung Un has a window of opportunity to attack since we are militarily spread thin right now.
10) Economic sanctions have led to wars before.
11) Obama is no JFK.
Feel free to draw your own conclusions but I think we are headed into another major war in the Far East with possibly unpleasant consequences for us. 

Friday, August 31, 2012

ECONOMY

ECONOMY
It is no secret that out country is facing significant challenges and our leadership is working hard to come up with answers and solutions. As far as I can see, the financial health of our country is one of those challenges.  However, I am concerned that we might be looking at trees while failing to see the forest. We all know what happened when housing bubble burst and financial institutions faced melt down. However, I do not agree with expert opinions on what caused it. Here is my take on the issue and how to prevent it from happening again. Here are some of my observations on the health of our economy;
1)      In the 60s, every time there was a tax cut for the consuming segment, the economy recovered and the recession ended. Nowadays, after every tax cut for the consuming segment of the economy, I am talking about working class Americans, Pacific Rim Countries experience another economic expansion and every time there is a tax cut for the producing segment of our economy, the rich and the wealthy, U.S. Dollar takes another nose dive against Euro.
2)      In the 60s, every time a recession ended, jobs were created, but nowadays, all recoveries are jobless in general.
3)      After the WWII, the US economy supplied goods and services to the rest of the world without any competition from war torn countries like, France, Germany, Britain, Japan and China, but that is not the case anymore. We are no longer the only supplier of goods to the rest of the world and it appears our competition is strong. The proof? Our ever widening trade gap with the rest of the world, which means, our jobs are being shipped abroad.
So how we can solve the challenges we are facing today?
Remember the Economy 101 where we were first indoctrinated about “Supply and Demand”? Well, today I believe it is no longer supply and demand, but rather it is supply, demand and distribution of money, meaning fiscal and monetary policies of our government. Phrased differently, it should read if the money supply to consuming segment of the economy is larger than the money supply to the producing segment of the economy as a result of Fiscal and Monetary Policies, it results in inflation. Similarly, if the money supply to the producing segment of the economy is larger than the money supply to the consuming segment of the economy again as a result of Fiscal and Monetary Policies, it results in deflation. Now, let us introduce the names of two prominent economists, (luckily they are still around), Paul Volcker and Alan Greenspan, well known deflationary economists and former Fed Chairmen whose main job was to fight inflation. For the nearly 20 years, they were at the helm at Federal Reserve and relentlessly pursued a “Deflationary Policy” draining money supply from the consuming segment and in doing so, preparing our country for the financial meltdown we had recently experienced. Tipping point came, when 2nd Bush Presidency and Administration, further reducing the money supply once again to consuming segment by means of tax cuts to the top 2% in order to reduce the taxes on the producing segment of the economy.  Suddenly, consuming segment had no money to pay mortgages, credit cards, car loans and college tuition expenses, among others while producing segment shipped astronomical sums of capital to foreign countries (decline of dollar against Euro beginning from a parity) for investment in order to reduce labor costs to be competitive in a global economy.
So what do we do now? Almost everything we consume come labeled “Made in Somewhere Else” and as a result, the tax cuts for the consuming segment no longer create jobs here in the United States. The new technologies that are supposed to create new jobs are years away and are not exclusive to us. Trade deficit is in billions every month and the budget deficit is in trillions every year. Our government printing so much money that we stopped publishing M1 Money Supply Data during the Administration of Jr. Bush. A real dilemma, I would say. For whatever its worth, here is what I think we should do;
1)      Switch from a system of taxation on net profit to taxation on gross revenue in order to simplify tax code and increase transparency, both for individual and corporate filers. Under this new regime, corporations and businesses can only itemize payroll expenses for the first US$ 40,000 of compensation for each U.S. based employees only (non transferable between employees) including salary and wages, medical, dental and other health insurances, (part time, commission, contract and performance based pay should be excluded from itemization and no other itemization should be allowed). Tax rates should be readjusted and lowered in order to prevent an effective tax increase.
2)      Increase personal exemption significantly (to 24,000 from current 6,000 dollars per individual) while eliminating itemized deductions for individuals in order to eliminate taxing people living under poverty. According to our tax tables for 2009, if you made 5 taxable dollars last year, our government wants 2 dollars back in taxes.
3)      Increase to top tax rate to 70% for those earning over 1 million dollars.
4)      Remove cap on income subject to social security tax while reducing social security benefits for high end beneficiaries while increasing benefits for low end recipients, which will stimulate demand.
5)      Remove Federal Guaranties from Students Loans that are sold to secondary and tertiary financial institutions by primary lenders. Forgive the first US 100,000 of existing student loans, whether current or not, to reduce the deflationary burden on the consuming segment, primarily middle class.
6)      Rigorously implement on new rules on credit card companies and impose new rules to limit bank charges.
7)      Eliminate all taxes on new business start ups and venture capital investments in the USA for the first 5 years, if they continuously employ at least 1 full time employee with benefits and health insurance.
8)      Gradually switch from a payroll based taxation to a consumption based tax system, which should exclude food, pharmaceuticals and other essential consumer items.
9)      Impose a sale tax on all security exchanges including stocks, bonds, commodities, numismatics, foreign exchanges, options, futures and derivatives in order to reduce short selling and market manipulation.
10)   Coordinate taxing authority of states, counties, municipalities and local governments with that of the Federal Government, including toll roads, user and processing fees, real estate taxes, insurance deductibles and other forms of hidden taxes, in order to prevent over taxation.
11)   Eliminate all property taxes on primary residence at federal, state and county levels.
12)   Eliminate all taxes on U.S. citizens working overseas as expatriates to make it easier for U.S. citizens find jobs in other countries. (Did you know that the U.S. is the only country in the world that taxes its citizens working overseas?).
13)   Eliminate all tax breaks for companies and corporations and phase out all government subsidies.
14)   End the military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan immediately (we can change regimes but we can’t change cultures) and reduce the number of US bases in foreign countries while scaling down the size of the US military.
15)   Reduce or completely eliminate foreign aid.
16)   Reduce the cost of higher education and replace student loans with grants.
17)   Repeal the Bush Bankruptcy Law.
18)   Make it illegal to charge interest rates and fees to non-performing credit card loans and loans sold by primary lenders.
The list goes on, but the idea is simple. Increase the money supply to consuming segment of the economy until a balance between the consuming and the producing segments of the economy is established. Because right now, our economy is top heavy and as a result, it will keep on tipping over.
Now, critics will probably say, this is socialism. I am really not interested in what it is called. Main question here is to identify our nation’s economic challenges so necessary solutions can be found.  Furthermore, our so called capitalist system has proven itself to be unsustainable in its present form and it has to move to the center. It is no wonder that our economy came close to being bankrupt under Reagan and finally became bankrupt under Jr. Bush, both Republicans and supporters  of the “Trickle Down” economic theory. It is clear to me that economies can’t be built from top down, but they should be built from bottom up. Our country’s economic development proves that to be true.
Former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich makes an important observation in his new book “Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future”. On page 21, Fig: 1, he demonstrates a correlation between wealth distribution and the depression of 1929 as well as the great recession of 2008. It is another sign that our economy is top heavy and unless we implement a better tax system to insure a fair distribution of wealth, our problems will not go away. (You should really bring this chart to the attention of your wievership).
As far as I am concerned, it is clear beyond any reasonable doubt that our economy is suffering from a significant imbalance of money supplies to consuming and producing segments of our economy. Accordingly, all remedies should be directed toward striking a balance in the money supply between these two segments in order to induce a recovery with job creation. I firmly believe that nothing else will work and a robust economic recovery will be a pipe dream.

Signs of Higher Intelligence
Includes a desire and an inclination to;
1-  Search for knowledge
2- Preserve nature and protect environment
3- Elevate humanity above religion
4- Choose peace over war
5- Advocate fairness, tolerance and social justice
6- Stop cruelty
7- Support family
8- Be honest and work hard
9- Promote common good
10-Let people rule

Monday, August 13, 2012


THE FOUR PILLARS

There are four pillars of Conservatism according to a book written by a 14 year old named Jonathan Krohn and they are;
1- Respect for the Constitution
2- Respect for life,
3- Personal Responsibility
4- Less Government
Let us look at these briefly…
Let us start with the respect for the Constitution.  First Amendment clearly prohibits making of any law respecting to an establishment of a religion and impeding the free exercise of a religion and yet Conservatives assert that we are a Christian nation and there is no such thing as the separation of church and state. In fact, for Conservatives, church is the state. Furthermore, 10 Commandments must be posted in all schools, all government offices and all courts. All official activities should start with a Christian prayer. All mosques and synagogues should be closed and/or relocated to somewhere else, preferably to another country well beyond our borders.  This is what Conservatives mean when they talk about respect for the Constitution…
Respect for life… This is a good one since it stands for respect for life of the white Christian folks only. If you are a Jew or a Muslim or a Sikh or a Black or a Hispanic or an Oriental or a member of any other ethnic groups, you need to be put in concentration camps or deported or if necessary, be killed. Just ask a well know Conservative radio commentator, he’ll be happy to tell you what needs to be done.
Personal responsibility. Now this one requires that if you are in a leadership position, you must be responsible.   If you are a Conservative, however, it means go ahead and ruin the country’s economy by starting wars that are fought on borrowed money, double national debt so your rich supporters can get richer, steal elections by whatever means even if that means breaking the law, lie and claim that some country in the Middle East has WMDs, get rid of social security, Medicare and Medicaid declaring that they are nothing more than Ponzi schemes and claim that you need AK-47s, RPGs, and dirty bombs to protect our freedom. At a personal level, it also means that, ship American jobs overseas, raid corporations and companies and lay off workers, open up tax free accounts in Cayman Islands or Bermuda or stash some money away in a Swiss bank account or start a bogus IRA account so you don’t have to pay any tax on millions of dollars.
Finally, less government. This is another way of saying “you are on your own”. A tornado devastated your neighborhood?  You are on your own.  Lost your job and medical insurance and got sick and can’t afford medical care? You are on your own. You are laid off after 20 years with a company that went bankrupt and you can’t support your children? Don’t expect any unemployment benefits. You are poor? It is your fault (Remember Herman Cain?). Can’t afford higher education, don’t bother us… The list goes on and on.
Now, I do not consider myself to be a Conservative or a Liberal (I like to think of myself as an Independent) but in order to reflect the reality and the true values of Conservatism, I think their 4 pillars should be
1-      We are a Christian nation, all others must leave
2-      Choose war over peace
3-      Long live Plutocracy
4-      Down with social justice and fairness.
Having said that I really don’t think that those 4 pillars I have proposed will nearly be enough to describe Conservatism in full. Hence, here are some others for additional clarification;
5-      Take it from the needy and give it to the greedy.
6-      Ban theory of evolution and instead teach creationism
7-      If you can’t win a debate, launch a personal attack and/or demonize,
8-      Use coercion, incitement, intimidation, fear mongering and blackmail to get your point through
9-      Hide behind patriotism
10-   Don’t retreat, reload…
Feel free to chime in to add yours to the list…